The difference between Pitt and Georgia Tech may not be that big, but the difference in the technology that has come out since the two programs were founded has been monumental over the past four years.
The two programs share a lot of the same name, a commonality in the way they teach, and in the way that they use their curriculum. Pitt and Georgia Tech are both big, expensive, and proprietary schools that have a lot of money and a lot of prestige. It’s unfortunate that both of these programs are now using the same curriculum and are using it as if it were a new invention.
Both programs have been in a constant state of innovation for four years. While Pitt has been pushing out their new curriculum and Georgia Tech is teaching their students to use their new online tools like Powerpoint (which you’ve probably seen in their commercials), Pitt and Georgia Tech have been using the same curriculum for all three years. They aren’t using the same curriculum because they are using the same curriculum.
The reason for this is that Georgia Tech has taught all three years with the same curriculum, but Pitt has been teaching for two years with the same curriculum, but Pitt has been teaching the same curriculum and the same tools for two years, but Georgia Tech has only been teaching what they are using the same curriculum for for two years.
So how are the two schools making education more convenient for the same students? Why is it so much easier to teach Georgia Tech’s students than Pitt’s students? How do they expect Pitt students to learn more than Georgia Tech students? Well, what they are doing is using different curriculums. Georgia Tech is using this technology to help students learn at their own pace. Pitt is using this technology to help students learn at the pace of the teacher.
The two schools are using very different curriculums. Pitt uses a traditional college-style curriculum with lots of theory and memorization. Georgia Tech uses a more flexible “studio-like” approach to teaching. Our data on the subject indicates that the students of one school are learning and doing better than the students of the other school. And the two schools have actually done a pretty good job of making education more convenient for the same students.
The thing is, Pitt and Georgia Tech have pretty similar approaches to pedagogy. Both use a lot of lecture and memorization. Both schools also have a lot of hands-on experience teaching in the real world, so students in both schools are exposed to a lot of real-world learning.
This is why, in my opinion, Pitt is the better school. It really is a real world learning environment. Students in Pitt have a real life experience that most students don’t get in Georgia Tech. That’s why the two schools do so well. Georgia Tech’s approach is more “real world”, with a lot of hands-on experience. Pitt’s approach is more “real world” and more lecture based.
Pitts education system is a lot more real world. The school is situated in an area that is like a small town. Students go to the school for about six months, then they go to work as a firefighter, police officer, teacher, etc. There are no classes during the day or night. Thats a real world experience. Pitts is situated in an area that is more like a college where students work in a lab and do a lot of research.
Georgia tech is a more abstract approach. Georgia is based on the idea that technology is a tool. Technology is like a tool. Technology is just like a hammer. Technology is a tool that can be used to help us accomplish a specific task. Georgia is like a hammer that can also be used to do other things. Georgia is a whole other way to think.
